Gut microbiome research and sample shelf life

The time between collection of a stool sample and its processing in a laboratory has a significant impact on the quality and reliability of the test results. Our analysis shows that samples for research using the FISH analysis method (such as that of NL-Lab) remain reliable for significantly longer and are less expensive to transport than samples for other analysis techniques such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), next-generation sequencing (NGS), and selective culture.

Why fecal samples for NL-Lab's gut microbiome research have a longer shelf life and are more reliable.

Fecal samples are subject to biological decay, so they must be analyzed as quickly as possible. Travel time is influenced by several factors, such as distance, type of transport, weekends, and peak season. Temperature also significantly impacts sample quality.

In addition, the conditions for (optimal) transport differ per analysis technique:

Selective Breeding

Samples for culture should preferably be refrigerated and within 1-3 days of production. Within this period, the reliability of the measurement result decreases rapidly.

PCR and NGS

Stool samples suffer from so-called DNA polymerase inhibitors, which are always present in feces and inhibit the function of the 'engine' of the PCR reaction. Samples for PCR and NGS 3-4 days no longer yield a reliable result

A commonly used solution is the use of a preservative (fixative), but this has the disadvantage of requiring an additional step in sample preparation, which can easily introduce errors. Furthermore, the ratios between fixative and sample are not ideal, making proper mixing very difficult. Therefore, the effectiveness of these agents in gut microbiome research has not yet been convincingly demonstrated.

FISH

Samples analyzed using the FISH method only become unusable once the cell wall structure of the microbiome bacteria and their ribosomal cell contents have been compromised. Bacterial cells remain structurally intact for a long time and are therefore analyzable using FISH-based methods. We have tested this extensively at NL-Lab, and samples for FISH remain viable for at least 7 days and can still be reliably analyzed.

Other benefits FISH

The FISH method is not only superior in terms of sample durability, there are more advantages: FISH also offers a much higher analytical coverage (96% of the microbiome) and is the only method that can measure the microbial activity of bacterial groups.

Our patented and automated C-FISH method makes this superior method now also affordable for complex analyses such as gut microbiome research.

Interested or have questions?

If you are interested in gut microbiome research or have any questions about this article, we strongly encourage you to contact us.

To share:

Read also...
In this project, we investigate how new insights from the gut microbiome can contribute to better diagnostics and treatment...
gut-brain axis
As a healthcare professional, you've probably started exploring the application of gut microbiome research. How often have you since...
As a healthcare professional, you've probably started exploring the application of gut microbiome research. How often have you since...